A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out among prospective neighbours about the construction of a wall at a coastal web-site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide focus pursuing an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental fears, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Instances report about René Collier plus the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed right into a remarkably publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building operates at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, seek to make their spouse and children dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, exactly where development pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded citizens. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying made by their prospective neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted beneath planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each people of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their planning authorization by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Exclusive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as such parts are topic to rigorous controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological implications, specially in a sensitive coastal natural environment such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their scheduling authorization, and say the wall, that is partially created, is in the proper position. Their legal group has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their see, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal setting up disputes, wherever sights of the sea are the two very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site, according to sworn proof referenced from the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-significant drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Times, a picture that has since develop into emblematic on the intensity with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were being intended to gather visual proof on the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning in the sea Irish Situations noted, describing how The 2 Males entered the h2o throughout critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm h2o to photograph the positioning turned Just about the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Moments posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps had been cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was staying encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to grasp the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court heard more submissions on no matter if interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential second inside the legal timeline.
In the Main of your dispute is usually a disagreement around boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain the wall, as made, goes past what was authorized and intrudes into protected land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, is described as meticulous in his evaluation of organizing documents, maps, and disorders connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two pressured that their action is motivated by worry for environmental protection and adherence to setting up law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A non-public see, insisting in its place that it is about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got explained their prolonged-standing relationship to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple basically trying to make a spouse and children residence in accordance While using the law. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Exclusive Area of Conservation and say that all performs are actually carried out determined by Qualified advice and authorized strategies. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into The ocean through a storm, never alter the fundamental info.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute over design of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for just a problem that numerous observers see as significantly popular. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation concerning personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now far more contentious.
The Irish Instances post about René Collier pointed out the businessman experienced Earlier been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental concerns, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from extremely distinctive Skilled backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have become synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Periods protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by midsection-large h2o throughout a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded via waistline-significant h2o throughout a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting each the physical actuality on the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of your act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive method.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result remains uncertain. The court should decide whether the wall as constructed complies with preparing authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Distinctive Space of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and organizing problems. But the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Are living together with each other extended after the lawful prices are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction works at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, although the implications of the case lengthen beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. In addition it underscores how speedily a local disagreement can escalate when elementary issues for example environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of all-natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre in the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal issues. Whether it is going to finally be altered, removed, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will likely carry on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more intently viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent times.